MICHEAL J. SENG, District Judge.
Pursuant to the parties' status conference before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on April 10, 2014, the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to continue the trial date and extend the deadlines set by the Court in its Order Granting the Parties' Stipulation to Extend Discovery Deadlines and Dispositive Motion Deadlines, dated February 19, 2014. The parties stipulate to the following:
1. The trial date shall be continued from September 16, 2014 to
2. The deadline to complete non-expert discovery in compliance with Rule 26 shall be extended from April 15, 2014 to
3. The deadline to serve expert witness disclosures and expert reports in compliance with Rule 26(a)(2)(B) shall be extended from May 2, 2014 to
4. The deadline to serve rebuttal expert witness disclosures and expert reports shall be extended to
5. The deadline to complete all expert discovery, including depositions of expert witnesses shall be extended from June 16, 2014 to
6. The deadline to file, serve, and notice all non-dispositive motions shall be extended from June 16, 2014 to
Good cause exists for the requested trial continuance and corresponding extension of discovery and motion deadlines because there was extensive delay in obtaining plaintiff's medical bills due to the medical provider's policies and procedures. The delay in obtaining plaintiff's medical records and bills prevented defendant from deposing plaintiff because a review of plaintiff's medical records and bills prior to and at deposition is essential for the deposition to be of any value. The parties have finally received plaintiff's medical records and are in the process of scheduling plaintiff's deposition for a date in July. After plaintiff's deposition, additional time is necessary to conduct potential follow-up discovery.
Further, as a result of not having plaintiff's complete medical file, the parties were forced to postpone settlement discussions and continue a previously scheduled settlement conference. The parties would now like to attend a settlement conference with the hope that this matter can be resolved through settlement and that a trial will not be necessary. Additional time is necessary to schedule both plaintiff's deposition and a settlement conference so that the parties can engage in meaningful settlement discussions. Further, the parties ask that the trial and expert discovery deadlines be extended so that the parties do not need to waste time and resources conducting discovery that may no longer be necessary if the case is resolved through settlement.
Considering that trial is currently scheduled to begin in three months and the parties have been restricted from conducting essential discovery and engaging in productive settlement discussions, both parties agree that the requested continuance is necessary. Without the requested continuance, the parties would be severely prejudiced, as they would be unable to adequately prepare for trial and attempt to resolve this matter through settlement, thereby eradicating the need for trial.
WHEREAS, good cause exists for the relief requested herein, the Court hereby makes the foregoing Stipulation the Order of this Court