Porraz v. Colvin, 2:13-CV-01995-KJN. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140702842
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff's time to reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby extended from the present due date of June 27, 2014, by twenty-one days, to the new re
Summary: STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff's time to reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby extended from the present due date of June 27, 2014, by twenty-one days, to the new res..
More
STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff's time to reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby extended from the present due date of June 27, 2014, by twenty-one days, to the new response date of July 18, 2014, and all other deadlines be extended accordingly. This extension is requested because Plaintiff has a particularly heavy briefing schedule this month.
DATED: June 27, 2014. BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
[proposed] ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties showing good cause for a requested extension of Plaintiff's time to reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, the request is hereby APPROVED.
Plaintiff shall file her Reply on or before July 18, 2014.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
