RIDDICK v. AT&T, 2:12-cv-2033 KJM ACPS. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140702845
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jun. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge. In light of the appearance in propria persona by each of the individual plaintiffs, this matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). ECF No. 38. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for July 30, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom No. 26 before the undersigned. All parties shall appear by counsel or in person if acting without counsel. 2. The par
Summary: ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge. In light of the appearance in propria persona by each of the individual plaintiffs, this matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). ECF No. 38. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for July 30, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom No. 26 before the undersigned. All parties shall appear by counsel or in person if acting without counsel. 2. The part..
More
ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
In light of the appearance in propria persona by each of the individual plaintiffs, this matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). ECF No. 38. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for July 30, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom No. 26 before the undersigned. All parties shall appear by counsel or in person if acting without counsel.
2. The parties shall submit to the court and serve by mail on all other parties, no later than fourteen (14) days before the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference, an updated status report addressing the following matters:
a. Service of process;
b. Possible joinder of additional parties;
c. Any expected or desired amendment of the pleadings;
d. Jurisdiction and venue;
e. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;
f. The report required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 outlining the proposed discovery plan and its scheduling, including disclosure of expert witnesses;
g. Future proceedings, including setting appropriate cut-off dates for discovery and law and motion, and the scheduling of a pretrial conference and trial;
h. Special procedures, if any;
i. Estimated trial time;
j. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to the simplicity or complexity of the proceedings;
k. Whether the case is related to any other cases, including bankruptcy;
l. Whether a settlement conference should be scheduled;
m. Any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition of this matter.
3. Counsel and unrepresented parties are reminded of their continuing duty to notify chambers immediately of any settlement or other disposition. See Local Rule 160. In addition, the parties are cautioned that pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), opposition to the granting of a motion must be filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that "[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party." Moreover, Local Rule 230(j) provides that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules "may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court."
Source: Leagle
