Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CASTANEDA v. AMTRAK, 2:12-cv-0524-KJN PS. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140721663 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2014
Summary: FootNotes 1. Pursuant to the parties' voluntary consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the action proceeds before the undersigned for all purposes, including the entry of final judgment. (ECF Nos. 8, 31, 34.) 2. The court's analysis was outlined in detail in the October 16, 2013 order ( see ECF No. 36), which is incorporated by reference, and need not be repeated here.

FootNotes


1. Pursuant to the parties' voluntary consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the action proceeds before the undersigned for all purposes, including the entry of final judgment. (ECF Nos. 8, 31, 34.)
2. The court's analysis was outlined in detail in the October 16, 2013 order (see ECF No. 36), which is incorporated by reference, and need not be repeated here.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer