Duarte Nursery, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, CIV. S-13-2095 LKK/DAD. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140807b14
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 06, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2014
Summary: UNITED STATES' STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO FILE FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT; ORDER LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 230(c), the United States of America ("United States") hereby notifies the Court and Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants Duarte Nursery, Inc. and John Duarte ("Duarte") that the United States does not oppose the relief requested by Duarte's Motion to File First Supplemental Complaint. The United States, however, reserv
Summary: UNITED STATES' STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO FILE FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT; ORDER LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 230(c), the United States of America ("United States") hereby notifies the Court and Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants Duarte Nursery, Inc. and John Duarte ("Duarte") that the United States does not oppose the relief requested by Duarte's Motion to File First Supplemental Complaint. The United States, however, reserve..
More
UNITED STATES' STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO FILE FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT; ORDER
LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 230(c), the United States of America ("United States") hereby notifies the Court and Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants Duarte Nursery, Inc. and John Duarte ("Duarte") that the United States does not oppose the relief requested by Duarte's Motion to File First Supplemental Complaint. The United States, however, reserves all rights to answer or otherwise respond to any supplemental or amended complaint that the Court grants leave for Duarte to file. Such response may include a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The parties agree that the hearing scheduled for August 11, 2014 is unnecessary, and further agree that it should be vacated if the Court concludes that the motion may be disposed of without a hearing.
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to File First Supplemental Complaint. Without prejudice to the United States' right to answer or otherwise respond to the First Supplemental Complaint, the unopposed motion is granted. Further, the motion hearing noticed for August 11, 2014 is vacated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle