Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Turner v. County of Kern, 1:11-cv-1366-AWI-SKO. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140813860 Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 11, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE CASE INCLUDING DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF KERN AND WESLEY KRAFT; [PROPOSED] ORDER ANTHONY W. ISHII, District Judge. COME NOW the Parties to this matter, Plaintiffs David Lee Turner, Jr., individually and as successor in interest to David Lee Turner, Sr., deceased, Alfonso Turner, Ahmad Turner, Whittney Turner, Jalisa Turner, Tiffany Turner, Nacole Turner, and Desmond Turner, as Plaintiffs and rightful heirs of decedent, David Lee Turner Sr., 1 Joint Stipul
More

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE CASE INCLUDING DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF KERN AND WESLEY KRAFT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

ANTHONY W. ISHII, District Judge.

COME NOW the Parties to this matter, Plaintiffs David Lee Turner, Jr., individually and as successor in interest to David Lee Turner, Sr., deceased, Alfonso Turner, Ahmad Turner, Whittney Turner, Jalisa Turner, Tiffany Turner, Nacole Turner, and Desmond Turner, as Plaintiffs and rightful heirs of decedent, David Lee Turner Sr.,

1 Joint Stipulation for a Dismissal of the Entire Action, with Prejudice (hereinafter "Plaintiffs") through their counsel of record Brian T. Dunn, of the Cochran Law Firm, and Gerson Horn of the Law Offices of Gerson Horn, and Defendants County of Kern and Wesley Kraft (hereinafter collectively "County Defendants") through their counsel of record Marshall S. Fontes of Kern County Counsel's Office, and provide as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the Parties to this action through their designated counsel, that the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety as to any complaint, allegation and/or cause of action against County Defendants, more specifically the dismissal of the entire applicable complaint of Plaintiffs against Defendants County of Kern and Wesley Kraft.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the aforementioned dismissal is in consideration of a resolution of the matter by the Parties, and that each party hereby agrees to bear all of its/their own costs and attorney's fees with respect to this litigation.

ORDER

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk shall CLOSE this case in light of the parties signed Stipulation for Dismissal of this case with prejudice (see Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41(a)(1)); and 2. All currently pending dates in this matter, including the September 9, 2014, trial-date, are VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer