ORDER

KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.

On July 28, 2014, plaintiff filed an ex parte application seeking to extend the deadline for filing dispositional documents to August 11, 2014. (ECF 39.) Plaintiff reasons a final extension is warranted because plaintiff "simply needs additional time for receipt and clearance of [the] settlement draft." (Id. at 3.) Specifically, plaintiff states "[a]lthough a finalized settlement agreement was reasonably believed to have been reached when [p]laintiff previously requested an extension to file dispositional documents, [p]laintiff discovered an additional term that required revision." (Id.) Plaintiff further represents that "parties have now agreed to the terms of a finalized settlement agreement . . ., and [p]laintiff's counsel simply awaits an executed copy of the agreement from [p]laintiff and reasonably believes that the executed agreement will be received as early as . . . July 28, 2014." (Id.)

The court has extended the deadline for filing dispositional documents in this case on three prior occasions. (ECFs 34, 36, & 38.) In the court's final order, granting the third request to extend the deadline for filing dispositional documents, the court noted that no further extensions of time would be granted. (ECF 38.) As of August 7, 2014, no dispositional documents have been filed.

Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby ORDERED, within seven (7) days of entry of this order, to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the court's orders.

IT IS SO ORDERED.