CARMONA v. D'ALESSANDRO, 2:10-cv-0898 KJM KJN P. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140818794
Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 14, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2014
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On August 5, 2014, defendant filed a request to conduct plaintiff's deposition by videoconference due to budgetary constraints. Good cause appearing, defendant's request is granted. However, the court reporter must be physically located where the plaintiff is located. Moreover, nothing in this order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which plaintiff is housed to obtain videoco
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On August 5, 2014, defendant filed a request to conduct plaintiff's deposition by videoconference due to budgetary constraints. Good cause appearing, defendant's request is granted. However, the court reporter must be physically located where the plaintiff is located. Moreover, nothing in this order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which plaintiff is housed to obtain videocon..
More
ORDER
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On August 5, 2014, defendant filed a request to conduct plaintiff's deposition by videoconference due to budgetary constraints. Good cause appearing, defendant's request is granted. However, the court reporter must be physically located where the plaintiff is located. Moreover, nothing in this order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which plaintiff is housed to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendant's request (ECF No. 44) is granted; and
2. Defendant may conduct plaintiff's deposition by videoconference.
Source: Leagle
