Filed: Aug. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2014
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. On June 13, 2014, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. On July 16, 2014, defendant re-served the motion on plaintiff's new address of record. Twenty-one days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. On June 13, 2014, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. On July 16, 2014, defendant re-served the motion on plaintiff's new address of record. Twenty-one days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any ..
More
ORDER
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
On June 13, 2014, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. On July 16, 2014, defendant re-served the motion on plaintiff's new address of record. Twenty-one days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not opposed the motion.
Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . ." On September 17, 2013, plaintiff was advised of the requirements for filing an opposition to a motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. See Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988).]
Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules "may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court." In the order filed September 17, 2013, plaintiff was also advised that failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed.
Finally, Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides:
Involuntary Dismissal; Effect. If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the action or any claim against it. Unless the dismissal order states otherwise, a dismissal under this subdivision (b) and any dismissal not under this rule—except one for lack of jurisdiction, improper venue, or failure to join a party under Rule 19—operates as an adjudication on the merits.
Id.
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary judgment. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as consent to have the: (a) action dismissed for lack of prosecution; and (b) action dismissed based on plaintiff's failure to comply with these rules and a court order. Such failure shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
