Filed: Aug. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 26, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; FINDINGS AND ORDER STIPULATION TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and the defendants, by and through their counsels of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on August 28, 2014. 2. By this stipulation, the defendants now move to continue the status conference until October 30, 2014, and to exclude time
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; FINDINGS AND ORDER STIPULATION TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and the defendants, by and through their counsels of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on August 28, 2014. 2. By this stipulation, the defendants now move to continue the status conference until October 30, 2014, and to exclude time b..
More
STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; FINDINGS AND ORDER STIPULATION
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and the defendants, by and through their counsels of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on August 28, 2014.
2. By this stipulation, the defendants now move to continue the status conference until October 30, 2014, and to exclude time between August 28, 2014, and October 30, 2014, under Local Code T4. Plaintiff does not oppose this request.
3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:
a. The government has represented that the discovery associated with this case includes approximately 98 pages of investigative reports and related documents in electronic form. All of this discovery has been either produced directly to counsel and/or made available for inspection and copying.
b. Defendant Garik Voskanyan is scheduled to have surgery on August 27, 2014, and will need time to recover in order to continue working on the case with defense counsel.
c. Counsel for the defendants desire additional time to consult with their respective clients, to review the current charges, to conduct investigation and research related to the charges, to review and copy discovery for this matter, to discuss potential resolutions with their clients, to prepare pretrial motions, and to otherwise prepare for trial.
c. Counsel for the defendants believe that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
d. The government does not object to the continuance.
e. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
f. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of, August 28, 2014 through October 30, 2014, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
4. Nothing in this stipulation and order sh
ORDER
IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.
