NET v. NAPOLITANO, 2:13-cv-2340 DAD P. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140911770
Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2014
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. A recent court order was served on petitioner's address of record and returned to the court by the postal service as undeliverable. It appears that petitioner has failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty-three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and petitioner has failed to notify the court of a current add
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. A recent court order was served on petitioner's address of record and returned to the court by the postal service as undeliverable. It appears that petitioner has failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty-three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and petitioner has failed to notify the court of a current addr..
More
ORDER
DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.
A recent court order was served on petitioner's address of record and returned to the court by the postal service as undeliverable. It appears that petitioner has failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty-three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and petitioner has failed to notify the court of a current address.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice due to petitioner's failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b).1
FootNotes
1. Both parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (Doc. Nos. 3 & 4)
Source: Leagle
