Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Disney v. City of Tehachapi, 1:14-CV-0095-LJO-JLT. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140923921 Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2014
Summary: AMENDED ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (Doc. 28) JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs Disney and Graff and the Defendant City of Tehachapi, acting by and through their respective attorneys of record, as follows: 1. The current Mandatory Scheduling Conference is set for October 22, 2014. 2. Counsel for Plaintiffs has had an extremely busy calendar over the last 30 days. 3. Counsel for Plaintiffs and counsel f
More

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (Doc. 28)

JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs Disney and Graff and the Defendant City of Tehachapi, acting by and through their respective attorneys of record, as follows:

1. The current Mandatory Scheduling Conference is set for October 22, 2014.

2. Counsel for Plaintiffs has had an extremely busy calendar over the last 30 days.

3. Counsel for Plaintiffs and counsel for City have been meeting and conferring regarding the Mandatory Scheduling Conference Joint Statement over the past two weeks.

4. Counsel for Plaintiffs is currently attempting service of the Summons and Second Amended Complaint upon the individual Defendants in this action, who have not yet been served.

5. Counsel for Plaintiffs suffered damage to his lower front teeth, including the breaking off of one tooth, approximately August 31, 2014. He had a temporary repair done on September 2, 2014, which failed on approximately September 3, 2014. It was again temporarily repaired on September 4, 2014.

6. Counsel was in trial from September 8, 2014 through September 12, 2014.

7. The temporary repair failed again on September 16, 2014. Counsel for Plaintiffs again consulted the dentist on September 17, 2014, and underwent the first of three 2-hour dental surgeries on September 18, 2013.

8. These problems interfered with the ability of counsel for Plaintiffs to complete the Mandatory Scheduling Conference Joint Statement.

9. Counsel for Defendant City and counsel for Plaintiffs believe that a continuance of approximately two weeks will allow for service of process on the remaining individual defendants and a more careful completion of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference Joint Statement.

10. For these reasons, counsel for Plaintiffs has requested and the Council for Defendant City has agreed to this stipulation to continue the Mandatory Scheduling Conference for at least four weeks to October 20, 2014, or such other day as is convenient to the Court's calendar. They further stipulate that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference Joint Statement be filed two weeks before the Mandatory Scheduling Conference.

ORDER

Good cause appearing, the scheduling conference is CONTINUED to November 6, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. The joint scheduling conference statement SHALL be filed no later than October 29, 2014. Telephonic appearances via the CourtCall service are authorized.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer