Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Whitten v. Frontier Communications Corporation, 2:12-CV-02926-TLN-EFB. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140929604 Visitors: 18
Filed: Sep. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION RE: EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES AND ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, CITIZENS TELECOM SERVICES COMPANY, L.L.C., and KEVIN MAILLOUX and Plaintiff PHYLLIS WHITTEN, subject to the approval of the Court, hereby stipulate and agree through their respective counsel, as follows: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT: 1. The parties have filed their Joint Statement pertaining to one of the discovery issues raised in the Court's July 30, 2014 Ord
More

STIPULATION RE: EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES AND ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, CITIZENS TELECOM SERVICES COMPANY, L.L.C., and KEVIN MAILLOUX and Plaintiff PHYLLIS WHITTEN, subject to the approval of the Court, hereby stipulate and agree through their respective counsel, as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT:

1. The parties have filed their Joint Statement pertaining to one of the discovery issues raised in the Court's July 30, 2014 Order Granting Defendants' Ex Parte Application for an Order Extending the Deadline for Defendants to File a Discovery Motion. Because of the Court's schedule, they were unable to secure a hearing date with Magistrate Judge Brennan until October 29, 2014.

2. The parties would like the discovery issue raised in their Joint Statement resolved before they need to retain expert witnesses. Therefore, because of this October 29, 2014 hearing date and Defendants' pending Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication, the parties agree that the deadline to make expert witness disclosures should be extended to January 9, 2015 and any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosures shall be made on or before February 13, 2015.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer