Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

OSTAPENKO v. MEYER, 2:14-cv-1176 DAD P. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20141009868 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2014
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, alleging that respondent and the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement are unlawfully detaining him at the Yuba County Jail. On June 19, 2014, the undersigned ordered respondent to file a response to the petition. Thereafter, counsel for respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition as having been rendered moot. According to respondent's motion, petitioner was r
More

ORDER

DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, alleging that respondent and the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement are unlawfully detaining him at the Yuba County Jail. On June 19, 2014, the undersigned ordered respondent to file a response to the petition. Thereafter, counsel for respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition as having been rendered moot. According to respondent's motion, petitioner was released from detention on August 9, 2014. (Resp't's Mot. to Dismiss at 1 & Ex.) Petitioner has not opposed or otherwise responded to respondent's pending motion to dismiss.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date of this order petitioner shall show cause in writing why this court should not grant the pending motion to dismiss the habeas petition filed in this court as having been rendered moot by his release.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer