Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MOORE v. PIERCE, 1:14-cv-00965-LJO-SAB. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20141016777 Visitors: 26
Filed: Oct. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 15, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendants Robert Pierce dba Sandy's Country Junction; Elaine Pierce dba Sandy's Country Junction; Robert & Elaine Pierce, Inc., dba Sandy's Country Junction; Vittorio Di Cicco; and Sandra Di Cicco, the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captione
More

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER

LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendants Robert Pierce dba Sandy's Country Junction; Elaine Pierce dba Sandy's Country Junction; Robert & Elaine Pierce, Inc., dba Sandy's Country Junction; Vittorio Di Cicco; and Sandra Di Cicco, the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

ORDER

The parties having so stipulated,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer