Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Green v. County of Sacramento, 2:13-cv-00949 TLN KJN. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20141016813 Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 14, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 14, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DATE OF EXPERT WITNESS DESIGNATIONS TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. STIPULATION WHEREAS, Plaintiffs in the above-entitled action filed the Complaint in this action on May 13, 2013. WHEREAS, Expert Witness Designations are currently due on October 10, 2014. WHEREAS, the last day to hear Dispositive Motions is currently set for February 12, 2015; WHEREAS, the trial of this action is currently set for August 3, 2015. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' counsel has been in tri
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DATE OF EXPERT WITNESS DESIGNATIONS

TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs in the above-entitled action filed the Complaint in this action on May 13, 2013.

WHEREAS, Expert Witness Designations are currently due on October 10, 2014.

WHEREAS, the last day to hear Dispositive Motions is currently set for February 12, 2015;

WHEREAS, the trial of this action is currently set for August 3, 2015. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' counsel has been in trial in Espinosa v. City and County of San Francisco, CAND case no. C 06-34686 JSW, since selecting a jury on September 3, 2014 until yesterday, October 8, 2014.

WHEREAS, expert witnesses retained by Plaintiffs will not have their expert reports ready prior by October 10, 2014, due to a miscommunication in getting records to the expert witnesses.

WHEREAS, a 14 day extension should not impact the Court's pre-trial scheduling order in any other way.

WHEREFORE, The parties stipulate to extend the date of expert witness designations and exchange of expert reports by 14 days, to October 24, 2014.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, good cause shown, the date of expert witness designations is hereby extended by 14 days to October 24, 2014. No other dates in the Court's Pre-Trial Scheduling Order in this case shall be affected by the extension.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer