CODDINGTON v. WARDEN, SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON, 2:01-cv-01290 KJM CKD. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20141028k66
Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 27, 2014
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. Petitioner filed a traverse on October 20, 2014. The court intends the next step in these proceedings to be resolution of the issues raised by the application of 28 U.S.C. 2254(d) to petitioner's claims. Within twenty days of the filed date of this order, the parties shall file a joint statement explaining whether the section 2254(d) issues have been adequately briefed in the pleadings. If the parties feel they have not, they shall propose a briefi
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. Petitioner filed a traverse on October 20, 2014. The court intends the next step in these proceedings to be resolution of the issues raised by the application of 28 U.S.C. 2254(d) to petitioner's claims. Within twenty days of the filed date of this order, the parties shall file a joint statement explaining whether the section 2254(d) issues have been adequately briefed in the pleadings. If the parties feel they have not, they shall propose a briefin..
More
ORDER
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner filed a traverse on October 20, 2014. The court intends the next step in these proceedings to be resolution of the issues raised by the application of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) to petitioner's claims. Within twenty days of the filed date of this order, the parties shall file a joint statement explaining whether the section 2254(d) issues have been adequately briefed in the pleadings. If the parties feel they have not, they shall propose a briefing schedule.
Source: Leagle
