Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

STANLEY v. WARDEN, SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON, 2:95-CV-1500 JAM CKD. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20141105762 Visitors: 14
Filed: Nov. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 04, 2014
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. Petitioner seeks respondent's compliance with Local Rule 191(h)(1) to obtain the record of the state court's retrospective competency proceedings. (ECF No. 946.) Respondent's counsel asserts Rule 191(h)(1) is not applicable in this situation. (ECF No. 951.) However, respondent notes that this court has authority to order him "to file the court documents related to the 2011 competency proceedings in Lake County Superior Court." ( Id. at 3.) This orde
More

ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

Petitioner seeks respondent's compliance with Local Rule 191(h)(1) to obtain the record of the state court's retrospective competency proceedings. (ECF No. 946.) Respondent's counsel asserts Rule 191(h)(1) is not applicable in this situation. (ECF No. 951.) However, respondent notes that this court has authority to order him "to file the court documents related to the 2011 competency proceedings in Lake County Superior Court." (Id. at 3.) This order requires respondent to do so.

Within five days of the filed date of this order, petitioner shall file a statement explaining which portions of the state court record he lacks. Within twenty days thereafter, respondent shall file a notice that he has lodged those portions of the record with the court or explain why he was unable to do so.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer