B.O.L.T. v. CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, 2:14-cv-01588-GEB-DAD. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20141107722
Visitors: 19
Filed: Nov. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2014
Summary: ORDER CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge. The parties' Joint Status Report ("JSR") filed October 27, 2014, reveals this case is not ready to be scheduled. Although this is a putative class action, Plaintiffs do not address in the JSR when they will seek class certification. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c)(1) prescribes "the court must determine by order whether to certify the action as a class action" at "an early practicable
Summary: ORDER CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge. The parties' Joint Status Report ("JSR") filed October 27, 2014, reveals this case is not ready to be scheduled. Although this is a putative class action, Plaintiffs do not address in the JSR when they will seek class certification. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c)(1) prescribes "the court must determine by order whether to certify the action as a class action" at "an early practicable ..
More
ORDER CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE
GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.
The parties' Joint Status Report ("JSR") filed October 27, 2014, reveals this case is not ready to be scheduled. Although this is a putative class action, Plaintiffs do not address in the JSR when they will seek class certification. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c)(1) prescribes "the court must determine by order whether to certify the action as a class action" at "an early practicable time."
Therefore, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for November 10, 2014, is continued to December 15, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. A further joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the Status Conference, in which the parties shall propose a briefing schedule on Plaintiffs' proposed motion for class certification and address whether the action should otherwise be scheduled pending decision on that motion. In the event the parties opine the matter should be scheduled, they shall address in the further joint status report their proposals for such scheduling in accordance with Local Rule 240. Plaintiffs shall also address in the joint status report when they will seek leave to file the First Amended and Supplemental Complaint referenced in the JSR at 3:2-5:5.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
