STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR SECOND EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, District Judge.

WHEREAS, on October 7, 2014, Plaintiff, Ronald Moore ("Moore"), and Defendant, AMI, Ltd., a California Limited Partnership ("AMI," and together with Moore, "the Parties"), entered into a stipulation extending AMI's time to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint to October 22, 2014 (Dkt. 15);

WHEREAS, on October 22, 2014, Plaintiff, Ronald Moore ("Moore"), through his attorney of record, Tanya E. Moore, advised AMI through attorney Timothy L. Thompson, who is also representing AMI although has not yet officially appeared in this action, that Moore would not take a default against AMI before October 31, 2014, unless the case had not yet settled and a response had not been filed;

WHEREAS, the Parties are currently exploring settlement, a settlement agreement having been tentatively accepted by AMI and discussions regarding the monetary element of Moore's claim currently being undertaken; and

WHEREAS, the Parties wish to fully explore and exhaust settlement efforts prior to incurring the expense of AMI preparing and filing its responsive pleading;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties hereto, through their respective counsel, pursuant to Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 144, that Defendant, AMI, LTD., A CALIFORNIA PARTNERSHIP, shall have an extension of time up to and including NOVEMBER 21, 2014, to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint on file herein. This extension does not alter any date or event set by Court order, including the Scheduling Conference set for

ORDER

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant AMI, LTD., a California Limited Partnership, shall file a response to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint on or before November 21, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED.