Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. APPROXIMATELY $81,013.41 SEIZED FROM JP MORGAN CHASE BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER 3060031290, 2:14-MC-00091-WBS-AC. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20141205769 Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE AND/OR TO OBTAIN AN INDICTMENT ALLEGING FORFEITURE WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and claimant Manuel Luna, through undersigned counsel, as follows: 1. On or about April 10, 2014, claimant Manuel Luna filed a claim, in the administrative forfeiture proceedings, with the Internal Revenue Service with respect to the Approximately $81,013.41 seized fro
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE AND/OR TO OBTAIN AN INDICTMENT ALLEGING FORFEITURE

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and claimant Manuel Luna, through undersigned counsel, as follows:

1. On or about April 10, 2014, claimant Manuel Luna filed a claim, in the administrative forfeiture proceedings, with the Internal Revenue Service with respect to the Approximately $81,013.41 seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Account Number 3060031290, held in the name of Manuel Luna (hereafter "defendant funds"), which were seized on February 7, 2014.

2. The Internal Revenue Service has sent the written notice of intent to forfeit required by 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(1)(A) to all known interested parties. The time has expired for any person to file a claim to the defendant funds under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(2)(A)-(E), and no person other than the claimant has filed a claim to the defendant funds as required by law in the administrative forfeiture proceeding.

3. Under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the United States is required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture within ninety days after a claim has been filed in the administrative forfeiture proceedings, unless the court extends the deadline for good cause shown or by agreement of the parties. That deadline was July 9, 2014.

4. By Stipulation and Order filed July 3, 2014, the parties stipulated to extend to October 7, 2014, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture.

5. By Stipulation and Order filed October 3, 2014, the parties stipulated to extend to December 8, 2014, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture.

6. As provided in 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the parties wish by agreement for an extension to February 6, 2015, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture.

7. Accordingly, the parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture shall be extended to February 6, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer