HENDERSON v. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, 2:12-cv-0532 JAM CKD P. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20141211848
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 10, 2014
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. A review of the court's file indicates that plaintiff, defendant Lazo and defendant Gardner have consented to have all matters in this action before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Defendant York has neither consented, nor declined consent. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send defendant York a copy of the "Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge" form; and 2.
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. A review of the court's file indicates that plaintiff, defendant Lazo and defendant Gardner have consented to have all matters in this action before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Defendant York has neither consented, nor declined consent. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send defendant York a copy of the "Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge" form; and 2. ..
More
ORDER
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
A review of the court's file indicates that plaintiff, defendant Lazo and defendant Gardner have consented to have all matters in this action before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Defendant York has neither consented, nor declined consent. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send defendant York a copy of the "Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge" form; and
2. Defendant York shall file the form within seven days indicating whether he will consent to have all future matters in this action, including trial, before a United States Magistrate Judge, presently the undersigned.
Source: Leagle
