TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Jeannette Rodriguez and Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co. (collectively, the "Parties"), through their attorneys of record:
WHEREAS, the Complaint in this matter was filed on September 30, 2014, in the Superior Court of the County of San Joaquin, Case No. 39-2014-00316668-CU-OE-STK, alleging claims of (1) California Labor Code Retaliation; (2) Failure to Pay Minimum Overtime Wages; (3) Failure to Provide Meal and Rest Breaks; (4) Waiting Time Penalties; (5) Failure to Provide Accurate Wage Statements; (6) Disability Discrimination in Violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA); (7) Failure to Accommodate; (8) Failure to Engage in the Interactive Process; (9) FEHA Retaliation; (10) the California Family Rights Act (CFRA) Interference; (11) CFRA Retaliation; (12) Wrongful Termination in Violation of Public Policy; and (13) Defamation; (14) Unfair Business Practice in violation of Business And Professions Code §17200; (15) Penalties pursuant to the Private Attorney General Act (PAGA); (16) Failure to Produce Records; and (17) Negligent Training (the "Claims");
WHEREAS, on October 31, 2014, Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co. removed this matter to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, Case No. 2:14-cv-02553;
WHEREAS, the Parties now agree to submit the Claims, as set forth in Case No. 2:14-cv-02553, to final and binding individual arbitration through Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services (JAMS); and
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the JAMS arbitrator shall have the authority to adjudicate Plaintiff's individual claim for penalties under PAGA
The Claims set forth in Case No. 2:14-cv-02553 shall be submitted to final and binding arbitration in accordance with the terms of the Arbitration Policy/Agreement and "NAMS Employment Arbitration Rules & Procedures effective July 15, 2009";
2. All Matters in Case No. 2:14-cv-2553 shall be stayed in this Court pending arbitration;
3. This Court will retain jurisdiction for the sole purpose of entering the final judgment on the arbitration proceedings, as necessary; and
4. The Parties agreed that Plaintiff's Complaint pending in the USDC EDCA shall constitute Plaintiff's written demand for arbitration to JAMS pursuant to "JAMS Employment Arbitration Rules & Procedures effective July 15, 2009," shall be deemed to have been submitted to Defendant as of November 26, 2014, and Defendant will timely respond thereto.