Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cloud v. Van Ness, 2:14-cv-02308-TLN-AC. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20141215655 Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DUE DATE OF JOINT STATUS REPORT TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. Plaintiff Kristine Cloud, as trustee of the Dorothy I. Gavle Revocable Trust, defendant Daryl Van Ness and specially appearing defendant Round Prairie Lutheran Church (the "Church"), by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Plaintiff filed the instant action on October 2, 2014; 2. On October 3, 2014, the Court issued its Order Requiring Joint Status Report ("Order"
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DUE DATE OF JOINT STATUS REPORT

TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Kristine Cloud, as trustee of the Dorothy I. Gavle Revocable Trust, defendant Daryl Van Ness and specially appearing defendant Round Prairie Lutheran Church (the "Church"), by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. Plaintiff filed the instant action on October 2, 2014; 2. On October 3, 2014, the Court issued its Order Requiring Joint Status Report ("Order""). Pursuant to the Order, a Joint Status Report is currently due on or before Friday, December 12, 2014; 3. On November 21, 2014, the Church filed a motion to dismiss the complaint against it pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) on the basis of lack of personal jurisdiction and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) on the basis of improper venue (the "Motion"); 4. The Church does not submit, and is not submitting, to the jurisdiction of this Court through signing this stipulation and is only specially appearing to continue the due date of the Joint Status Report so as to avoid irreparable harm in having to litigate this action. This stipulation shall not be construed as a waiver of the Church's right to contest personal jurisdiction or a waiver of the Motion itself; 5. The Motion is set for hearing on January 29, 2015; 6. All parties agree that the requested continuance of the due date of the Joint Status Report will not result in prejudice to any party to this action; and 7. That the Court, therefore, continue the due date for filing the Joint Status Report until 30 days after issuance of the Court's ruling on the Motion.

NOW THEREFORE, the parties stipulate that the due date for the Joint Status Report be continued to 30 days after issuance of the Court's ruling on the Motion.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer