SMITH v. KIESZ, 11-cv-1918 JAM CKD P. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20141218a74
Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2014
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has requested a sixth extension of time to file his pretrial statement. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time (ECF No. 95) is granted. 2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file and serve his pretrial statement. 3. Plaintiff's failure to file a pretrial statement within 30 days will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed wit
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has requested a sixth extension of time to file his pretrial statement. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time (ECF No. 95) is granted. 2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file and serve his pretrial statement. 3. Plaintiff's failure to file a pretrial statement within 30 days will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed with..
More
ORDER
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff has requested a sixth extension of time to file his pretrial statement. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time (ECF No. 95) is granted.
2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file and serve his pretrial statement.
3. Plaintiff's failure to file a pretrial statement within 30 days will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
4. Absent extraordinary cause, no further extensions of time will be granted. Plaintiff's failure to procure counsel will not be considered extraordinary cause considering plaintiff has now been given approximately 6 months to obtain counsel.
Source: Leagle
