Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. MENDEZ, Cr. S 04-379 MCE. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150107557 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2015
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO REDUCE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) RETROACTIVE DRUGS-MINUS-TWO REDUCTION CASE MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge. Defendant, MARCOS MENDEZ by and through his attorney, Assistant Federal Defender David M. Porter, and plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through its counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jason Hitt, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2), this Court may reduce the term of imprisonment in the
More

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO REDUCE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) RETROACTIVE DRUGS-MINUS-TWO REDUCTION CASE

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.

Defendant, MARCOS MENDEZ by and through his attorney, Assistant Federal Defender David M. Porter, and plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through its counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jason Hitt, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), this Court may reduce the term of imprisonment in the case of a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(o);

2. On October 21, 2010, this Court sentenced Mr. Mendez to a term of 72 months imprisonment;

3. His total offense level was 31, his criminal history category was II, the resulting guideline range was 121 to 151 months, and he received a reduction from the low end of the applicable guideline range on the government's motion;

4. The sentencing range applicable to Mr. Mendez was subsequently lowered by the United States Sentencing Commission in Amendment 782, made retroactive on July 18, 2014, see 79 Fed. Reg. 44,973;

5. Mr. Mendez's total offense level has been reduced from 31 to 29, and his amended guideline range is 97 to 121 months; a reduction comparable to the one received at the initial sentencing would produce a term of 58 months; and,

6. Accordingly, the parties request the Court enter the order lodged herewith reducing Mr. Mendez's term of imprisonment to a total term of 58 months.

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the stipulated motion of the defendant for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

The parties agree, and the Court finds, that Mr. Mendez is entitled to the benefit Amendment 782, which reduces the total offense level from 31 to 29, resulting in an amended guideline range of 97 to 121 months. A reduction comparable to the one received at the initial sentencing would produce a term of 58 months.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the term of imprisonment imposed in October 2010 is reduced to a term of 58 months.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other terms and provisions of the original judgment remain in effect. The clerk shall forthwith prepare an amended judgment reflecting the above reduction in sentence, and shall serve certified copies of the amended judgment on the United States Bureau of Prisons and the United States Probation Office.

Unless otherwise ordered, Mr. Mendez shall report to the United States Probation Office within seventy-two hours after his release.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer