THOMASON v. CITY OF FOWLER, 1:13-CV-00336-AWI-BAM. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150108854
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 06, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff DEREK THOMASON, through his attorney of record, Schonbrun DeSimone Seplow Harris & Hoffman, LLP and the Diaz Law Firm, and Defendants CITY OF FOWLER, DAVID ELIAS AND MICHAEL BRAND, through their attorney of record, the law firm Lozano Smith, that the complaint and entire action in the above-captioned case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(a)
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff DEREK THOMASON, through his attorney of record, Schonbrun DeSimone Seplow Harris & Hoffman, LLP and the Diaz Law Firm, and Defendants CITY OF FOWLER, DAVID ELIAS AND MICHAEL BRAND, through their attorney of record, the law firm Lozano Smith, that the complaint and entire action in the above-captioned case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(a)(..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff DEREK THOMASON, through his attorney of record, Schonbrun DeSimone Seplow Harris & Hoffman, LLP and the Diaz Law Firm, and Defendants CITY OF FOWLER, DAVID ELIAS AND MICHAEL BRAND, through their attorney of record, the law firm Lozano Smith, that the complaint and entire action in the above-captioned case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
ORDER
Based upon the instant STIPULATION, the Plaintiff's complaint and action in Thomason v. City of Fowler, et. al., Case No. .: 1:13-CV-00336-AWI-BAM, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
