Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. LUANGRATH, Cr. F 07-571 GEB. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150109515 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jan. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2015
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION AND [lodged] ORDER TO REDUCE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) RETROACTIVE DRUGS-MINUS-TWO REDUCTION CASE GARIAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge. Defendant, AID LUANGRATH, JR., by and through his attorney, Assistant Federal Defender David M. Porter, and plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through its counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jason Hitt, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2), this Court may reduce the term of imp
More

STIPULATED MOTION AND [lodged] ORDER TO REDUCE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

RETROACTIVE DRUGS-MINUS-TWO REDUCTION CASE

GARIAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.

Defendant, AID LUANGRATH, JR., by and through his attorney, Assistant Federal Defender David M. Porter, and plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through its counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jason Hitt, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), this Court may reduce the term of imprisonment in the case of a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(o);

2. On January 16, 2009, this Court sentenced Mr. Luangrath to a term of 102 months imprisonment;

3. His total offense level was 31, his criminal history category was I, and the resulting guideline range was 108 to 135 months;

4. On government motion, Mr. Luangrath received a downward departure from the low end of the guideline range to receive a term of 102 months;

5. The sentencing range applicable to Mr. Luangrath was subsequently lowered by the United States Sentencing Commission in Amendment 782, made retroactive on July 18, 2014, see 79 Fed. Reg. 44,973;

6. Mr. Luangrath's total offense level has been reduced from 31 to 29, his amended guideline range is 87-108 months, and a reduction to a comparable point below the amended range would produce a term of 79 months; and,

7. Accordingly, the parties request the Court enter the order lodged herewith reducing Mr. Luangrath's term of imprisonment to a total term of 79 months.

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the stipulated motion of the defendant for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

The parties agree, and the Court finds, that Mr. Luangrath is entitled to the benefit Amendment 782, which reduces the total offense level from 31 to 29, resulting in an amended guideline range of 87-108 months.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the term of imprisonment imposed on January 16, 2009 is reduced to a term of 79 months.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other terms and provisions of the original judgment remain in effect. The clerk shall forthwith prepare an amended judgment reflecting the above reduction in sentence, and shall serve certified copies of the amended judgment on the United States Bureau of Prisons and the United States Probation Office.

Unless otherwise ordered, Mr. Luangrath shall report to the United States Probation Office within seventy-two hours after his release.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer