STANFIELD v. CITY OF FRESNO, 1:14-cv-01389-KJM-BAM. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150113685
Visitors: 21
Filed: Jan. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2015
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge. This court, consistent with Local Rule 240(a), requires "parties to the action . . . to appear in person at the [s]tatus [c]onference through lead counsel. . . ." (Order at 1, ECF No. 9.) The court held an initial status conference on January 8, 2015. (ECF No. 14.) Counsel for plaintiff did not appear at the conference and, as of the date of this order, has not provided the court with any reason for the nonappearance. Accordingly, counsel for plainti
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge. This court, consistent with Local Rule 240(a), requires "parties to the action . . . to appear in person at the [s]tatus [c]onference through lead counsel. . . ." (Order at 1, ECF No. 9.) The court held an initial status conference on January 8, 2015. (ECF No. 14.) Counsel for plaintiff did not appear at the conference and, as of the date of this order, has not provided the court with any reason for the nonappearance. Accordingly, counsel for plaintif..
More
ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
This court, consistent with Local Rule 240(a), requires "parties to the action . . . to appear in person at the [s]tatus [c]onference through lead counsel. . . ." (Order at 1, ECF No. 9.) The court held an initial status conference on January 8, 2015. (ECF No. 14.) Counsel for plaintiff did not appear at the conference and, as of the date of this order, has not provided the court with any reason for the nonappearance.
Accordingly, counsel for plaintiff is hereby ORDERED, within seven (7) days of entry of this order, to show cause why it should not be sanctioned in the amount of $250.00 for failing to appear.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
