Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MOORE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 2:14-cv-0820-KJN. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150113705 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 12, 2015
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. Presently pending before the court is plaintiff's "request for judgment." (ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff proceeds in this action without counsel. Pursuant to the court's scheduling order (ECF No. 5), plaintiff's "request for judgment," liberally construed as a motion for summary judgment, is premature, because the Commissioner has not yet filed and served the administrative record. Therefore, the court denies the motion without prejudice as premature and wi
More

ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

Presently pending before the court is plaintiff's "request for judgment." (ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff proceeds in this action without counsel.

Pursuant to the court's scheduling order (ECF No. 5), plaintiff's "request for judgment," liberally construed as a motion for summary judgment, is premature, because the Commissioner has not yet filed and served the administrative record. Therefore, the court denies the motion without prejudice as premature and will not consider the contents of that motion. After the Commissioner files the administrative record, plaintiff may file a motion for summary judgment in accordance with the requirements and deadlines set forth in the court's scheduling order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's "request for judgment" (ECF No. 16) is denied without prejudice as premature. 2. The Clerk of Court shall serve another copy of the court's previous scheduling order (ECF No. 5) on plaintiff by mail.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer