STANLEY A. BOONE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Christopher I. Simmons is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On January 12, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion to extend the scheduling deadlines pending receipt of his legal materials. (ECF No. 105.)
On January 15, 2015, Defendants filed a statement of non-opposition. The Court acknowledges and appreciates defense counsel's diligence in addressing Plaintiff's situation and compliance with the Local Rules by filing a response to Plaintiff's motion.
On July 22, 2014, Defendants Akanno, Grissom, St. Lucia, and Rients filed an answer to Plaintiff's first amended complaint. (ECF No. 89.) On July 23, 2014, the Court issued a discovery and scheduling order, and the deadline for discovery is set to expire on March 23, 2015. (ECF No. 90.)
In his motion, Plaintiff indicates that he was recently transferred to Atascadero State Hospital and is presently without his legal materials which are in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR). Without his legal materials Plaintiff has been unable to conduct discovery. Plaintiff requests the Court make an allowance for the time he has been without his materials, and he requests the Court "issue an order so that Plaintiff's legal materials can be expeditiously provided to him to allow him to proceed" with discovery. (ECF No. 105, Mot. p. 1.)
After receiving notice of Plaintiff's motion, defense counsel immediately contacted A. DeLong, the litigation coordinator at Atascadero State Hospital. Ms. DeLong confirmed that Plaintiff was transferred to Atascadero from the California Medical Facility on December 5, 2014, as a "Code 2684-Psych & Return" patient. Accordingly to Ms. DeLong, this code is reserved for CDCR inmates who are transferred to Department of State Hospitals for psychiatric treatment. (Delgado Decl. at ¶ 4.) Ms. DeLong explained that because "2684 transfers" are only temporary, the inmates' personal property is not transferred with them. (
In light of Plaintiff's present circumstances as explained and confirmed by Ms. DeLong, defense counsel does not oppose Plaintiff's motion to modify the scheduling order. Defendants request, however, that in lieu of resetting any dates now, the Court impose a brief stay of the proceedings until after Plaintiff's medical issues are resolved and he has returned to the California Medical Facility, where his legal property is located. Defense counsel submits that he will provide a status report every thirty days at the Court's request.
On the basis of good cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: