FARLEY v. VIRGA, 2:13-cv-1751 WBS KJN P. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150122899
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 20, 2015
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. On November 13, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying plaintiff's motion for law library access and for a 180 days extension of time to file his opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 83.) Pursuant to the mailbox rule, on December 8, 2014, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of that order. Local Rule 303(b), states "rulings by Magistrate Judges . . . shall be final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the C
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. On November 13, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying plaintiff's motion for law library access and for a 180 days extension of time to file his opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 83.) Pursuant to the mailbox rule, on December 8, 2014, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of that order. Local Rule 303(b), states "rulings by Magistrate Judges . . . shall be final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Co..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
On November 13, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying plaintiff's motion for law library access and for a 180 days extension of time to file his opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 83.) Pursuant to the mailbox rule, on December 8, 2014, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of that order.
Local Rule 303(b), states "rulings by Magistrate Judges . . . shall be final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within fourteen days . . . from the date of service of the ruling on the parties." Id. Plaintiff's request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order of November 13, 2014, is therefore untimely.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's December 24, 2014 request for reconsideration (ECF No. 85) is denied.
Source: Leagle
