Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. MEROYAN, 1:14-CR-00181 LJO SKO. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150130a64 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 29, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge. Defendants GEVORG MEROYAN and DAVID MANUKYAN, by and through their counsel of record George Mgdesyan and Carrie Christine McCreary, and plaintiff the United States of America, by and through their counsel of record, hereby jointly stipulate and respectfully request that the status conference currently set for February 2, 2015, be continued to March 30, 2015, and that the Court order that time be excluded unde
More

STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.

Defendants GEVORG MEROYAN and DAVID MANUKYAN, by and through their counsel of record George Mgdesyan and Carrie Christine McCreary, and plaintiff the United States of America, by and through their counsel of record, hereby jointly stipulate and respectfully request that the status conference currently set for February 2, 2015, be continued to March 30, 2015, and that the Court order that time be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act through the status conference on March 30, 2015.

The grounds for this stipulation are that a continuance of time through March 30, 2015 is required to provide time for consideration of potential resolution and defense preparation, taking into account due diligence. Since the last status conference, the government has provided proposed plea terms to both defendants, and the defendants will require time to consider the potential plea terms with their counsel and to further prepare for trial if the resolution is not reached.

In addition, the current status conference was inadvertently set during the time of a pre-paid planned vacation for counsel for defendant Meroyan.

A continuation of the status conference to March 30, 2015, would result in a more efficient use of time for the court and the parties, and there would otherwise not be sufficient time for effective defense preparation and plea negotiations before February 2, 2015.

The parties agree and stipulate that time should be excluded in the interests of justice through and including the continued status conference on March 30, 2015, under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (7)(B)(i) & (iv), in that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The parties' stipulated request for a continuance of the status conference date is GRANTED for defense preparation and to allow the parties additional time to achieve a mutually agreeable resolution of this matter. Should the parties resolve the case, they shall request that the matter be reset as a change of plea hearing before United States District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on March 30, 2015, at 8:30 a.m. If the parties are unable to resolve the matter, they shall be prepared to select a mutually agreeable trial date at the next status conference.

It is ordered that time be excluded in the interests of justice based on the grounds set forth in the parties' stipulation, through and including the continued status conference date of March 30, 2015, under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (7)(B)(iv), in that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer