FRASER v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., 2:13-cv-0520 TLN DAD. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150130a87
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 29, 2015
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, District Judge. Pending before the court is defendant's January 26, 2015 ex parte application for an order shortening time to hear defendant's motion to compel prior to the close of discovery in this action. (Dkt. No. 24.) Plaintiff has filed an opposition to defendant's motion. (Dkt. No. 28.) However, on January 28, 2015, the assigned District Judge issued an order extending the close of discovery to allow the undersigned to hear and rule upon defendant's motion to compe
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, District Judge. Pending before the court is defendant's January 26, 2015 ex parte application for an order shortening time to hear defendant's motion to compel prior to the close of discovery in this action. (Dkt. No. 24.) Plaintiff has filed an opposition to defendant's motion. (Dkt. No. 28.) However, on January 28, 2015, the assigned District Judge issued an order extending the close of discovery to allow the undersigned to hear and rule upon defendant's motion to compel..
More
ORDER
DALE A. DROZD, District Judge.
Pending before the court is defendant's January 26, 2015 ex parte application for an order shortening time to hear defendant's motion to compel prior to the close of discovery in this action. (Dkt. No. 24.) Plaintiff has filed an opposition to defendant's motion. (Dkt. No. 28.)
However, on January 28, 2015, the assigned District Judge issued an order extending the close of discovery to allow the undersigned to hear and rule upon defendant's motion to compel. (Dkt. No. 31.) Accordingly, defendant's ex parte application for an order shortening time (Dkt. No. 24) is denied as having been rendered moot. Defendant's motion to compel will be heard before the undersigned on February 20, 2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
