PORTER v. TRAQUINA, 2:12-cv-2266 TLN DAD P. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150206a02
Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 04, 2015
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. Defense counsel has filed a motion to modify the court's discovery and scheduling order. Specifically, counsel requests additional time to take plaintiff's deposition and to file a dispositive motion in light of plaintiff's delay in responding and/or failure to respond to defendant's written discovery requests. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant's motion to modify the court's discovery and scheduling order (Doc. No. 29) is gr
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. Defense counsel has filed a motion to modify the court's discovery and scheduling order. Specifically, counsel requests additional time to take plaintiff's deposition and to file a dispositive motion in light of plaintiff's delay in responding and/or failure to respond to defendant's written discovery requests. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant's motion to modify the court's discovery and scheduling order (Doc. No. 29) is gra..
More
ORDER
DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.
Defense counsel has filed a motion to modify the court's discovery and scheduling order. Specifically, counsel requests additional time to take plaintiff's deposition and to file a dispositive motion in light of plaintiff's delay in responding and/or failure to respond to defendant's written discovery requests.
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendant's motion to modify the court's discovery and scheduling order (Doc. No. 29) is granted;
2. Defense counsel shall take plaintiff's deposition within 60 days of the date of this order and shall file any dispositive motion within 120 days of the date of this order; and
3. Except as provided in this order, the court's discovery and scheduling order remains in effect.
Source: Leagle
