Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ARCURE v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES, 1:13-cv-00541-LJO-BAM. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150210672 Visitors: 23
Filed: Feb. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 09, 2015
Summary: STIPULATED ORDER TO RESOLVE DISCOVERY DISPUTE REGARDING PLAINTIFF COOK'S MEDICAL RECORDS (SEE DOC. 141); ORDER BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge. STIPULATION Plaintiff and Defendant California Department of Developmental Services ("DDS") have reached an agreement that resolves their discovery dispute regarding three of DDS's subpoenas for Plaintiff Cook's medical and mental health records that are the subject of a motion for a protective order (Doc. 141). The terms of the stipulation are
More

STIPULATED ORDER TO RESOLVE DISCOVERY DISPUTE REGARDING PLAINTIFF COOK'S MEDICAL RECORDS (SEE DOC. 141); ORDER

BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge.

STIPULATION

Plaintiff and Defendant California Department of Developmental Services ("DDS") have reached an agreement that resolves their discovery dispute regarding three of DDS's subpoenas for Plaintiff Cook's medical and mental health records that are the subject of a motion for a protective order (Doc. 141). The terms of the stipulation are as follows:

1. All of Plaintiff Cook's medical and mental health records that have been subpoenaed by DDS shall be produced to Matthew Besmer, Deputy Attorney General, but may only be used for purposes of this litigation and may only be shared with the following, without further stipulation of the parties or order of the Court:

• Members of the California Attorney General's Office working on this case; • Hiren Patel; • Kate Jeffries; • A medical expert of defense counsel's choice.

2. Information obtained from Cook's medical records may be used for appropriate personnel actions only with prior approval from the Court.

SO STIPULATED

ORDER ON STIPULATION

Having considered the stipulated order to resolve the discovery dispute regarding Plaintiff Cook's medical records and the motion for a protective order concerning those records production (Doc. 146), the Court adopts the stipulation in its entirety. This Order terminates plaintiffs' motion for protective order. (Doc. 141.)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer