CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
On February 10, 2015, this matter came on for hearing regarding defendant's discovery motion (ECF No. 17). Assistant United States Attorneys Samuel Wong and Richard Bender appeared for the government. William Portonova and Lily Moallem appeared for the defendant. Upon review of the filings, arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1.
This request is granted as follows:
As to the attachments to Report No. 6 of the ESA investigation, previously reviewed by defendant's counsel, the government will make these documents available to defendant's counsel at a mutually convenient time at the U.S. Attorney's Office, to review again under the terms and conditions of the protective order previously in place.
As to the documents in this category not previously turned over to defendant, the government will submit them to the Court within 7 days, Bates-stamped and accompanied by any objections and assertions of privilege, for
2.
This request is withdrawn.
3.
This request is granted and denied in part: The government will produce Mann's cell phone records from both his government-issued and personal phones, redacted as to any non-official business (e.g., calls to family), for the dates of February 26, 2012 and February 27, 2012, but not for February 28, 2012.
4. Photos, videos, and recorded audio on Special Agent Mann's cell phone(s):
This request is granted as follows: To the extent such records exist, the government shall produce them.
5.
This request is withdrawn.
6.
This request is withdrawn.
7. Copies of "CLEAR search of telephone numbers":
This request is denied.
8.
This request is granted as follows: If written policies exist concerning the recording of interviews, surreptitiously or otherwise, the government will produce copies of these policies. If no such policy exists, the government will inform defendant.
9.
This request is granted as follows: If written policies exist concerning whether the victim of an incident should or should not be the investigating agent, the government will produce copies of these policies. If no such policy exists, the government will inform defendant.
10.
This request is denied without prejudice, pending a review by defendant's expert of the data provided to date.
11.
This request is denied without prejudice.
12.
This request is denied.
13.
This request is granted as follows: The government will produce materials in compliance with
14.
This request is granted as follows: To the extent any such information exists, the government will produce it.
15.
This request is denied.
16.
This request is denied.
17.
This request is granted as follows: The government will provide any correspondence relating to site visits in January 2010, October 2010, and February 27, 2012. The request is otherwise denied.
18.
This request is denied.
19.
The parties are ordered to meet and confer as to this request, which is denied without prejudice.