CORREA v. WARDEN, CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON, 2:14-cv-2160 JAM CKD P. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150220973
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2015
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. On January 13, 2015, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner file an opposition to respondent's pending motion to dismiss within thirty days or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will resu
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. On January 13, 2015, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner file an opposition to respondent's pending motion to dismiss within thirty days or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will resul..
More
ORDER
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 13, 2015, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner file an opposition to respondent's pending motion to dismiss within thirty days or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Source: Leagle
