Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HEILMAN v. CHERNISS, 2:11-cv-0042-JAM-EFB P. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150306718 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 05, 2015
Summary: ORDER EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff has filed a motion for an order to prison officials to allow him to communicate with his incarcerated witnesses prior to the trial scheduled to begin on March 23, 2015. ECF No. 144. Plaintiff declares that officials "have failed to process" the requests he has submitted to correspond with his witnesses Oliver Overton and Daniel Patillo.
More

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a motion for an order to prison officials to allow him to communicate with his incarcerated witnesses prior to the trial scheduled to begin on March 23, 2015. ECF No. 144. Plaintiff declares that officials "have failed to process" the requests he has submitted to correspond with his witnesses Oliver Overton and Daniel Patillo. Defendants have not yet responded to the motion.

It is hereby ORDERED that defendants shall coordinate with CDCR counsel and inquire as to the status of plaintiff's requests to correspond with his inmate witnesses prior to trial. Defendants shall inform the court by March 10, 2015 of:

a. the status of plaintiff's requests for correspondence; and

b. if plaintiff's requests have been denied, the reasons for the denial.

So ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer