GARCIA v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, 2:13-cv-02164-WBS-CKD (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150313904
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 11, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY'S PENDING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT No hearing set or required. WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Plaintiff Kathleen Garcia and Defendant Standard Insurance Company ("Standard") conferred upon the date to be selected for the hearing on Standard's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed February 22, 2015 (the "Motion" (PACER Docs 22-23)). Prior to filing the Motion, the last date available f
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY'S PENDING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT No hearing set or required. WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Plaintiff Kathleen Garcia and Defendant Standard Insurance Company ("Standard") conferred upon the date to be selected for the hearing on Standard's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed February 22, 2015 (the "Motion" (PACER Docs 22-23)). Prior to filing the Motion, the last date available fo..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY'S PENDING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
No hearing set or required.
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
Plaintiff Kathleen Garcia and Defendant Standard Insurance Company ("Standard") conferred upon the date to be selected for the hearing on Standard's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed February 22, 2015 (the "Motion" (PACER Docs 22-23)). Prior to filing the Motion, the last date available for the hearing, as communicated by the Courtroom Deputy, was April 20, 2015. Subject to the Court's approval, Standard and Garcia stipulated and agreed as follows in connection with selecting April 20, 2015, as the hearing date on the Motion, so that (i) Standard and Garcia would have additional time to brief (beyond the dates specified in Local Rule 230(b)-(c)), and, (ii) the Court would have additional time to consider the Motion prior to the April 20 hearing:
1. The Response of Garcia to the Motion will be due on or before March 25, 2015.
2. The Reply of Standard on the Motion will be due on or before April 9, 2015. (Standard had originally agreed to file the Reply on or before April 10 but has adjusted its own due date, which in no way impacts the obligations of Garcia, back one day to April 9, to give the Court an extra day to consider the Motion following completion of all filing.)
3. Aside from adjusting the due dates of the Response and Reply briefing (and the due dates of the filing of all papers related to the same) of the Motion, no other deadline is hereby changed.
4. Standard and Garcia respectfully point out that the foregoing schedule will also provide additional time to the Court to consider the Motion.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
