ALVERNAZ INVESTMENTS, LLC v. PAWLIK, 2:14-cv-2957 TLN DAD PS. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150324a98
Visitors: 20
Filed: Mar. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2015
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . By Notice of Removal filed December 22, 2014, this unlawful detainer action was removed from the Sacramento County Superior Court. Defendants are proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On January 9, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . By Notice of Removal filed December 22, 2014, this unlawful detainer action was removed from the Sacramento County Superior Court. Defendants are proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On January 9, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections ..
More
ORDER
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
By Notice of Removal filed December 22, 2014, this unlawful detainer action was removed from the Sacramento County Superior Court. Defendants are proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On January 9, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. The fourteen-day period has expired, and no party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed January 9, 2015 (Dkt. No. 3) are adopted in full;
2. This action is summarily remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court;
3. And, this case is closed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
