MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.
Plaintiff, United States of America, through Assistant U.S. Attorney Andre Espinosa; and defendant Dean Christiansen, through counsel Gregory W. Foster, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. A status conference is currently set for March 26, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.
2. By this stipulation, the above-named defendant now moves to continue the status conference to April 23, 2015 at 9:00 a.m., and to exclude time between March 26, 2015 and April 23, 2015 under Local Code T4. Plaintiff does not oppose this request.
3. The basis upon which the parties agree to this proposed continuance of the status conference is as follows:
4. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case and excluding time as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
5. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 16 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period from March 26, 2015 to April 23, 2015, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(a), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance by the Court at the defendants request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.
6. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.
7. Finally, Gregory W. Foster has been authorized by all counsel to sign this stipulation on their behalf.
The status conference and hearing on Defendant's Motion for Hearing on Mental Competency are continued to April 23, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. The time period from March 26, 2015 to April 23, 2015, inclusive, is excluded for purposes of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 16 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(a), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance by the Court at the defendants request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.