OSBAND v. WARDEN OF SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON, 2:97-CV-0152-KJM. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150327c24
Visitors: 20
Filed: Mar. 25, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 25, 2015
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . Petitioner seeks a twelfth extension of time for filing his reply to Respondent's answer brief regarding the application of 28 U.S.C. 2254(d) to claims I, V, IX and X. Pursuant to the court's order granting Petitioner's eleventh request the reply brief is due March 23, 2015. Petitioner's counsel cite a family crisis and work on other cases as grounds for failing to complete their work. Counsel state that they do not anticipate any further reque
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . Petitioner seeks a twelfth extension of time for filing his reply to Respondent's answer brief regarding the application of 28 U.S.C. 2254(d) to claims I, V, IX and X. Pursuant to the court's order granting Petitioner's eleventh request the reply brief is due March 23, 2015. Petitioner's counsel cite a family crisis and work on other cases as grounds for failing to complete their work. Counsel state that they do not anticipate any further reques..
More
ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
Petitioner seeks a twelfth extension of time for filing his reply to Respondent's answer brief regarding the application of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) to claims I, V, IX and X. Pursuant to the court's order granting Petitioner's eleventh request the reply brief is due March 23, 2015. Petitioner's counsel cite a family crisis and work on other cases as grounds for failing to complete their work. Counsel state that they do not anticipate any further requests for time. Respondent does not oppose the request. The court, being fully informed in the matter, finds the request is supported by GOOD CAUSE and should be GRANTED.
Petitioner shall file his reply brief no later than May 4, 2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
