Filed: Apr. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 13, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr. , District Judge . WHEREAS, on March 10, 2015, the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians and Paskenta Enterprises Corporation ("Plaintiffs") filed the Complaint in this action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs completed service upon Defendants Ines Crosby, et al. ("Defendants") on various days thereafter; WHEREAS, ce
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr. , District Judge . WHEREAS, on March 10, 2015, the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians and Paskenta Enterprises Corporation ("Plaintiffs") filed the Complaint in this action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs completed service upon Defendants Ines Crosby, et al. ("Defendants") on various days thereafter; WHEREAS, cer..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., District Judge.
WHEREAS, on March 10, 2015, the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians and Paskenta Enterprises Corporation ("Plaintiffs") filed the Complaint in this action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs completed service upon Defendants Ines Crosby, et al. ("Defendants") on various days thereafter;
WHEREAS, certain Defendants have indicated their desire for additional time to evaluate the Complaint and the appropriate response thereto;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have given certain Defendants extensions of time to respond to the Complaint under Civil Local Rule 144(a), of between two and four weeks;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs believe that it would be in the interest of efficient case management to establish a unified schedule for all Defendants to respond to the Complaint and for any related motion practice under Fed. Rule. Civ. Pro. 12(b);
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, Civil Local Rules 143 and 144, and subject to approval by the Court:
1. Defendants shall have twenty-eight (28) days from April 8, 2015, up to and including May 6, 2015, to file a responsive pleading in this matter;
2. Alternatively, in the event Plaintiffs file an Amended Complaint prior to May 6, 2015, Defendants shall have twenty-eight (28) days from the date of the Amended Complaint's filing to respond to it;
3. If Defendant's responsive pleading to either Plaintiffs' Complaint or Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint is in the form of a motion under Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 12(b):
A. Plaintiffs' opposition to any such motion by Defendants will be due forty-five (45) days from the date Defendants' motion is filed; and
B. Defendants' reply in support of any such motion will be due fourteen (14) days from the date Plaintiffs' opposition is filed.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED:
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
