Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. APPROXIMATELY $18,400.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, 2:15-cv-00378-MCE-DAD. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150427682 Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 23, 2015
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , Chief District Judge . Pursuant to the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture, the Court finds: 1. This is a civil forfeiture action brought against Approximately $18,400.00 in U.S. Currency and Approximately $2,600.00 in U.S. Currency (collectively the "Defendant Currency"), which was seized on or about September 17, 2014. 2. A Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem ("Complaint") was filed on February 17, 2015, alleging th
More

FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE

Pursuant to the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture, the Court finds:

1. This is a civil forfeiture action brought against Approximately $18,400.00 in U.S. Currency and Approximately $2,600.00 in U.S. Currency (collectively the "Defendant Currency"), which was seized on or about September 17, 2014.

2. A Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem ("Complaint") was filed on February 17, 2015, alleging that said Defendant Currency is subject to forfeiture to the United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6).

3. On February 18, 2015, the Clerk issued a Warrant for Arrest for the Defendant Currency, and that warrant was duly executed on February 18, 2015.

4. Beginning on March 3, 2015, for at least 30 consecutive days, the United States published Notice of the Forfeiture Action on the official internet government forfeiture site www.forfeiture.gov. A Declaration of Publication was filed on April 3, 2015.

5. In addition to the public notice on the official internet government forfeiture site www.forfeiture.gov, actual notice or attempted notice was given to:

a. Stephen Curtis Van Horn

b. Jessica Van Skiver

6. Claimant Stephen Van Horn included a claim alleging an interest in the Defendant Currency with the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture. No other parties have filed claims or answers in this matter, and the time in which any person or entity may file a claim and answer has expired.

7. The Clerk of the Court entered a Clerk's Certificate of Entry of Default against Jessica Van Skiver on April 3, 2015. Pursuant to Local Rule 540, the United States and Claimant thus join in a request that as part of this Final Judgment of Forfeiture the Court enter a default judgment against the interests, if any, of Jessica Van Skiver without further notice.

Based on the above findings, and the files and records of the Court, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Court adopts the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture entered into by and between the parties to this action.

2. That judgment is hereby entered against Claimant Stephen Van Horn and all other potential claimants who have not filed claims in this action.

3. Upon entry of this Final Judgment of Forfeiture, $13,400.00 of the Approximately $18,400.00 in U.S. Currency and $2,600.00 in U.S. Currency, together with any interest that may have accrued on the total amount seized, shall be forfeited to the United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6), to be disposed of according to law.

4. Upon entry of this Final Judgment of Forfeiture, but no later than 60 days thereafter, $5,000.00 of the Approximately $18,400.00 in U.S. Currency shall be returned to Claimant Stephen Van Horn through his attorney Charles R. Farrar, Jr.

5. The United States and its servants, agents, and employees and all other public entities, their servants, agents, and employees, are released from any and all liability arising out of or in any way connected with the seizure, arrest, or forfeiture of the defendant currency. This is a full and final release applying to all unknown and unanticipated injuries, and/or damages arising out of said seizure, arrest, or forfeiture, as well as to those now known or disclosed. The parties waived the provisions of California Civil Code § 1542.

6. Claimant waived any and all claim or right to interest that may have accrued on the defendant currency.

7. All parties are to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.

8. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Final Judgment of Forfeiture.

CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE CAUSE

9. Based upon the allegations set forth in the Complaint filed February 17, 2015, and the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture filed herein, the Court enters this Certificate of Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465, that there was reasonable cause for the seizure and arrest of the defendant currency, and for the commencement and prosecution of this forfeiture action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer