SIMPSON v. GOOCH, 2:13-CV-01483-JAM-AC. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150511462
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2015
Summary: Order Re: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment/Summary Adjudication JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . On April 22, 2015, the court heard a regularly-scheduled argument on defendant Officer Gooch's motion for summary judgment/summary adjudication on the 9:30 a.m. calendar in Courtroom 6. Deputy Attorney General Kevin Reager of the California Attorney General's Office appeared for defendant. Manolo Olaso from the Law Offices of Johnny L. Griffin, III appeared for plaintiff Miya Simpson. Af
Summary: Order Re: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment/Summary Adjudication JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . On April 22, 2015, the court heard a regularly-scheduled argument on defendant Officer Gooch's motion for summary judgment/summary adjudication on the 9:30 a.m. calendar in Courtroom 6. Deputy Attorney General Kevin Reager of the California Attorney General's Office appeared for defendant. Manolo Olaso from the Law Offices of Johnny L. Griffin, III appeared for plaintiff Miya Simpson. Aft..
More
Order Re: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment/Summary Adjudication
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
On April 22, 2015, the court heard a regularly-scheduled argument on defendant Officer Gooch's motion for summary judgment/summary adjudication on the 9:30 a.m. calendar in Courtroom 6. Deputy Attorney General Kevin Reager of the California Attorney General's Office appeared for defendant. Manolo Olaso from the Law Offices of Johnny L. Griffin, III appeared for plaintiff Miya Simpson. After considering the parties' arguments, the pleadings, including, but not limited to, the defendant's motion [ECF 19], the plaintiff's opposition [ECF 20], the defendant's reply [ECF 21], and the documentary evidence submitted by the parties, the court DENIES the motion for summary judgment/summary adjudication for the reasons stated on the record in open court. Plaintiff's claims for supervisorial liability are dismissed on plaintiff's motion to dismiss them.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
