Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CORTEZ v. COLVIN, 1:14-cv-01016-SKO. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150513750 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 12, 2015
Latest Update: May 12, 2015
Summary: INFORMATIONAL ORDER FOR PRO SE LITIGANTS SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in an action seeking judicial review of an administrative decision of the Commissioner of Social Security that denied Plaintiff's claim for benefits under the Social Security Act. 1 This order provides the following information and serves as a step-by-step guide for pro se litigants. Plaintiff is strongly urged to read this order and keep it readily available for future reference.
More

INFORMATIONAL ORDER FOR PRO SE LITIGANTS

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in an action seeking judicial review of an administrative decision of the Commissioner of Social Security that denied Plaintiff's claim for benefits under the Social Security Act.1

This order provides the following information and serves as a step-by-step guide for pro se litigants. Plaintiff is strongly urged to read this order and keep it readily available for future reference.

I. Briefs

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief

Plaintiff's opening brief must be filed and served no later than June 5, 2015. (Doc. 15.) Plaintiff must serve a copy of the opening brief on all the attorneys listed for Defendant on the court docket of the case at the addresses noted on the court docket. Plaintiff is advised that failure to timely file an opening brief will result in dismissal of the action.

Plaintiff must also file the original opening brief, together with a copy, with the Court, by either personal delivery or via U.S. mail to:

Office of the Clerk United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 1501 Fresno, California 93721

Plaintiff's opening brief must contain the following:

(1) A plain description of Plaintiff's alleged physical or emotional impairments, when Plaintiff contends they became disabling, and how the impairments disabled Plaintiff from working;

(2) A summary of the administrative proceedings before the Social Security Administration;

(3) A summary of the relevant testimony at the administrative hearing;

(4) A summary of all relevant medical evidence, including an explanation of the significance of clinical and laboratory findings, and the purpose and effect of prescribed medication and therapy;

(5) A recitation of the Social Security Administration's findings and conclusions relevant to Plaintiff's claims;

(6) A short, separate statement of each of Plaintiff's legal claims explaining why the evidence is insufficient to support the ALJ's findings; and

(7) Any argument separately addressing each claimed error.

All references to the administrative record and all assertions of fact must be accompanied by citations to the administrative record. Any argument in support of each claim of error must be supported by citation to legal authority and an explanation as to how such authority applies to the facts of the particular case. Briefs that do not substantially comply with these requirements will be stricken. A document that is stricken becomes null and void and will not be considered by the Court for any purpose.

B. Defendant's Responsive Brief

Pursuant to the Scheduling Order, Defendant's responsive brief must be filed and served on Plaintiff by no later than July 9, 2015. (Doc. 15.)

C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief

Plaintiff may, but is not required to file a reply brief by no later than July 27, 2015. Plaintiff must serve a copy of the reply brief on Defendant by serving the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California at the address set forth in paragraph 1A above. Plaintiff must also file the original reply brief, together with a copy, with the Court at the Court's address noted above.

Plaintiff's reply brief should respond to the arguments made in Defendant's responsive brief.

II. The Court's Decision on the Merits

The Court will consider the merits of the case only after all briefs have been filed, and may enter judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the determination of the Social Security Administration. The Court may or may not remand the case to the Social Security Administration for a further hearing.

III. Summary of Deadlines

As Plaintiff's counsel recently withdrew and Plaintiff is proceeding without representation, the remaining case deadlines are set forth below:

Event Deadline Plaintiff's Opening Brief Filed June 5, 2015 Defendant's Brief Filed July 9, 2015 Plaintiff's Reply Brief (Optional) Filed July 27, 2015

IV. Rules for Litigating this Action

A. In litigating this action, the parties must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California ("Local Rules"). A copy of the Local Rules may be obtained in the Clerk's Office at no charge.

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE LOCAL RULES, FEDERAL RULES, OR A COURT ORDER, INCLUDING THIS ORDER, WILL BE GROUNDS FOR DISMISSAL OR OTHER APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

B. Documents intended to be filed with the Court must be mailed to the Clerk of the Court in Fresno, California, at the address noted above. See Local Rule 134(a). All documents mailed directly to a judge's chambers will be stricken from the record. A document requesting a court order must be styled as a motion, not as a letter. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.

C. Each separate document must be separately stapled. See Local Rule 130. If a document is stapled behind another document, it will not be filed and will not be docketed as a separate document.

D. All documents filed with the Court must be submitted with an additional legible copy for the Court's use. See Local Rule 133(d)(2). A document submitted without an extra copy for the Court's use will be stricken. If the filing party wishes the Court to return a file-stamped copy, an additional copy must be provided for that purpose (i.e., one original and two copies; one for the Court's use and one to be returned to the filing party), together with a self-addressed stamped envelope. The Court cannot provide copy or mailing service for a party — even for an indigent plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis. Copies of documents from the Court's file may be obtained from the Clerk's Office at the cost of fifty cents per page.

E. After any defendant has appeared in an action by filing a pleading responsive to the complaint (i.e., an answer or a motion to dismiss), all documents filed with the Court must include a proof of service stating that a copy of the document was served on the opposing party. See 28 U.S.C. § 1746; Fed. R. Civ. P. 5; Local Rule 135. A document submitted without the required proof of service will be stricken. Where a party is represented by counsel, service on the party's attorney of record constitutes effective service.

F. A pro se Plaintiff has a duty to keep the Court and opposing parties apprised of a current address. If Plaintiff moves and fails to file a notice of change of address, service of court orders at Plaintiff's prior address shall constitute effective notice. See Local Rule 182(f). If mail directed to Plaintiff is returned by the United States Postal Service as undeliverable, the Court will not attempt to re-mail it. If Plaintiff's address is not updated, in writing, within 60 days of mail being returned, the action will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Plaintiff's counsel was permitted to withdraw as Plaintiff's attorney of record on April 29, 2015.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer