Elawyers Elawyers

KENNEDY v. WARDEN, SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON, 2:13-cv-02041 KJM KJN DP. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150514835 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 13, 2015
Latest Update: May 13, 2015
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to the court's February 13, 2015 order, the parties filed a joint statement explaining the exhaustion status of the claims in the petition and proposing a briefing schedule for petitioner's motion to stay/abey these proceedings pending exhaustion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. The parties agree the following claims in the petition filed here on January 12, 2015, are unexhausted and this court finds they are:
More

ORDER

Pursuant to the court's February 13, 2015 order, the parties filed a joint statement explaining the exhaustion status of the claims in the petition and proposing a briefing schedule for petitioner's motion to stay/abey these proceedings pending exhaustion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. The parties agree the following claims in the petition filed here on January 12, 2015, are unexhausted and this court finds they are: Claim VI, subclaim (a); Claim VI, subclaim (b)(2); Claim VII, subclaim (a); Claim VII, subclaim (b)(1); Claim XI, subclaim (a); Claim XII; and Claim XIII. 2. Within 45 days of the filed date of this order, petitioner shall file any motion for stay and abeyance of these proceedings pending exhaustion. Within 30 days of petitioner's filing, respondent shall file a response. Within 15 days thereafter, petitioner may file a reply.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer