Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. MELKONYAN, 2:14-cr-083 KJM. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150514840 Visitors: 11
Filed: May 12, 2015
Latest Update: May 12, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR BAIL REVIEW AND TO EXCLUDE TIME ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, Matthew Yelovich and Michael D. Anderson, Assistant United States Attorneys, attorneys for Plaintiff, Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Matthew C. Bockmon, attorney for Mihran Melkonyan that the Motion for Bail Review hearing date of May 18, 2015 be continued one
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR BAIL REVIEW AND TO EXCLUDE TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, Matthew Yelovich and Michael D. Anderson, Assistant United States Attorneys, attorneys for Plaintiff, Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Matthew C. Bockmon, attorney for Mihran Melkonyan that the Motion for Bail Review hearing date of May 18, 2015 be continued one day to May 19, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd.

The continuance is requested due to the unavailability of the Pretrial Services Officer on May 18, 2015.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded of this order's date through and including May 19, 2015; pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and General Order 479, Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

The Court orders the time from the date the parties stipulated, up to and including May 19, 2015, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv) [reasonable time for counsel to prepare] and General Order 479, (Local Code T4). It is further ordered the May 18, 2015 Motion for Bail Review hearing shall be continued until May 19, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer