Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Moore v. Zamzami, 1:15-CV-00480-SAB. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150519698 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 18, 2015
Latest Update: May 18, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS NAGI MOHSEN ZAMZAMI, individually and dba CITY WIDE MARKET; KHADIGA M. ZAMZAMI; MOHAMED M. MUTHANA, individually and dba CITY WIDE MARKET; and AMRIA M. ALZAMZAMITO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT; ORDER STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, by and through their respective counsel, that Defendants NAGI MOHSEN ZAMZAMI, individually and dba CITY WIDE MARKET; KHADIGA M. ZAMZAMI; MOHAMED M.
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS NAGI MOHSEN ZAMZAMI, individually and dba CITY WIDE MARKET; KHADIGA M. ZAMZAMI; MOHAMED M. MUTHANA, individually and dba CITY WIDE MARKET; and AMRIA M. ALZAMZAMITO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT; ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, by and through their respective counsel, that Defendants NAGI MOHSEN ZAMZAMI, individually and dba CITY WIDE MARKET; KHADIGA M. ZAMZAMI; MOHAMED M. MUTHANA, individually and dba CITY WIDE MARKET; and AMRIA M. ALZAMZAMI (collectively "Defendants"), shall have an extension of time, to and including June 15, 2015, to respond to Plaintiff RONALD MOORE's Complaint.

A previous extension was provided to Defendants. A Court Order is required as the extension now exceeds twenty-eight (28) days. A court Order will not affect any date or event set by the court Order, including the scheduling conference. This extension is sought to afford the parties an opportunity to explore settlement.

Good cause exists for this second extension of time as Defendants are gathering the information necessary to explore an informal resolution with Plaintiff, including meeting with contractors who specialize in accessing requirements for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. It is the Parties' hope to fully exhaust informal settlement efforts before expending attorneys' fees and Court resources responding to the complaint.

This Stipulation may be executed in counterpart and by facsimile signature, each of which when executed shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one in the same Stipulation.

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation between the parties and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants, NAGI MOHSEN ZAMZAMI, individually and dba CITY WIDE MARKET; KHADIGA M. ZAMZAMI; MOHAMED M. MUTHANA, individually and dba CITY WIDE MARKET; and AMRIA M. ALZAMZAMI, shall have an extension of time to and including June 15, 2015 to respond to Plaintiff RONALD MOORE's Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer